The respondent, M.C., moved to vary a consent order to establish a specific access schedule with his child, K., and sought joint custody.
The applicant, J.D., and her parents, P.D. and B.D., opposed, arguing for supervised access or termination, citing K.'s mental health issues and M.C.'s anger.
The court found no material change in circumstances to justify varying the original consent order based on K.'s health, as these issues largely predated the order.
The court rejected P.D. and B.D.'s interpretation of "reasonable access as agreed by the parties" as an "agreement to agree," which would render the consent order unenforceable.
Consequently, the court set aside the entire consent order, temporarily continued joint custody with J.D. and her parents, and established a specific, unsupervised parenting time schedule for M.C. An OCL assessment was ordered, and all parties were mandated to take parent training courses.
