The appellant appealed his convictions for criminal harassment and failing to comply with court orders, arguing the trial judge's findings regarding harassing phone calls were unreasonable, that she failed to consider his defence of honest but mistaken belief regarding letters sent from jail, and that her reasons were inadequate.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge's conclusions were supported by a reasonable view of the evidence, that her findings on intent precluded the mistaken belief defence, and that her reasons sufficiently explained her decision.
