2 total
Appeal dismissed; court found a good arguable case that the claim against the federal Crown arose in Ontario.
The appellants appealed an order dismissing their motion for summary judgment, arguing for the first time that the Ontario Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under s. 21(1) of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act.
The respondent alleged that Canadian officials in Ottawa and consular staff in Egypt and Sudan actively facilitated the illegal removal of his daughter from Egypt to Ontario.
The court held it had jurisdiction to hear the new issue on appeal and found a good arguable case that the claim arose in Ontario, primarily because the issuance of a temporary passport by officials in Ottawa was the essential act that enabled the removal.
The appeal was dismissed.
Summary judgment motion dismissed in action alleging Canadian consular officials facilitated international child abduction.
The defendant brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiff's action for negligence, misfeasance in public office, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of section 7 of the Charter.
The plaintiff alleged that Canadian consular officials facilitated the kidnapping of his daughter by his ex-wife from Egypt to Canada.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that genuine issues requiring a trial existed regarding whether the defendant owed a duty of care, whether its actions constituted protected consular services, and whether the plaintiff's Charter rights were breached.
