The mother sought an order preventing the father from relocating to Montreal with their children and requested the appointment of the Office of the Children's Lawyer.
The father sought authorization for the relocation, arguing it was in the children's best interest.
The court, applying the principles from Gordon c.
Goertz, found a significant change in circumstances and determined that the relocation was in the children's best interest, considering their adaptability, strong paternal family ties in Montreal, and the father's career advancement.
The court authorized the father's relocation and denied the mother's request for the Office of the Children's Lawyer, finding it redundant given the children's expressed wishes were considered.
