The accused was charged with assault causing bodily harm, sexual assault, unlawful confinement, and breaches of probation following an incident in an apartment building.
The court relied on video surveillance, 911 call recordings, and witness testimony to assess credibility under the W.(D.) framework.
The court found the accused guilty of assault causing bodily harm, unlawful confinement, and failing to keep the peace, but acquitted him of sexual assault and consuming alcohol due to reasonable doubt arising from the complainant's intoxication and lack of corroboration.
