Following the settlement of an application under the Substitute Decisions Act regarding the property and personal care of their mother, the parties sought costs.
The applicant sought full indemnity costs from the mother's assets, while the respondents sought costs from the applicant.
The court found that the applicant had acted unreasonably, commenced unnecessary litigation, and rejected reasonable settlement offers.
The court ordered the applicant to personally pay $40,000 in costs to the respondents on a substantial indemnity basis, and limited the costs payable from the mother's assets to only those portions of the legal work that actually benefited her.