The respondent brought a motion to change a 2010 order terminating his access to his daughter.
The original order was made after a trial where the court found the respondent had engaged in inappropriate physical contact with the child, displayed extreme hatred toward the mother, and prioritized his own interests over the child's welfare.
The respondent sought to establish a material change in circumstances by arguing the child was older, he had other children, and the child wished contact with him.
The court found no material change in circumstances and dismissed the motion, noting the respondent continued to display the same problematic behaviors and attitudes that formed the basis of the original order.
