The children's aid society brought a motion for summary judgment seeking Crown wardship without access for three children.
The children had been apprehended due to physical abuse and had significant special needs.
The father opposed the motion, arguing he could parent the children and challenging the society's evidence regarding his behaviour during access visits.
The court applied the summary judgment framework and found no genuine issue requiring a trial.
The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrated that the father could not meet the children's complex needs and that Crown wardship without access for the purpose of adoption was in their best interests.
