Marilee Sherry

The applicant alleged that the respondent Society failed to comply with a settlement agreement requiring it to provide reasons for not disclosing information about her former partner's children.

The Society explained that it was prohibited from sharing the information under the Children's Law Reform Act because the applicant was not a parent.

The Child and Family Services Review Board found that the Society met its obligation to provide reasons under the Child, Youth and Family Services Act and dismissed the allegation of non-compliance.

The applicant alleged that the respondent Society failed to comply with a settlement agreement requiring it to provide reasons for the apprehension of her children.

The Child and Family Services Review Board held a documentary review after the applicant refused to stop recording a teleconference hearing.

The Board found that the Society had provided detailed and meaningful reasons for its actions, noting that disagreement with the reasons does not constitute non-compliance.

The complaint of non-compliance was dismissed.

The applicant alleged that the respondent children's aid society failed to comply with a term of their settlement agreement, which required the society to explain the reasons for apprehending the applicant's grandchild in 2008.

The Child and Family Services Review Board held a teleconference hearing to determine compliance.

The Board found that the society had provided a meaningful response explaining that the apprehension was necessary due to an ongoing police investigation and concerns about the child's care while with her biological father.

The Board concluded the society complied with the agreement and dismissed the applicant's complaint.