The parties, members of the same family, were involved in a dispute over the ownership and management of a family real estate holding company.
One brother moved for the appointment of an interlocutory receiver to oversee the company, while the other brother moved for summary judgment dismissing their mother's claim regarding her share ownership, and for the disbursement of funds held in trust.
The court dismissed the motion for a receiver, finding no evidence of irreparable harm and noting the company's substantial value.
The court also dismissed the summary judgment motion, concluding that the conflicting evidence regarding share transfers required a trial.
The motion to disburse trust funds was dismissed, though the court ordered that municipal tax arrears be paid directly from the funds.
