The respondents requested the removal of three personal respondents from a human rights application alleging sex discrimination and reprisal.
The applicant consented to the removal of one personal respondent.
The Tribunal removed a second personal respondent who had no direct dealings with the applicant and whose alleged conduct did not justify an individual remedy.
However, the Tribunal maintained the applicant's former supervisor as a personal respondent because he was no longer employed by the corporate respondent, meaning the corporate respondent could not enforce any public interest remedies (such as human rights training) ordered against him if the application succeeded.
