The respondent, Asif Qadar, successfully moved to dismiss an application brought by Jose Zepeda.
Qadar argued Zepeda lacked legal capacity and improperly sought corporate remedies in a personal capacity, circumventing derivative action requirements under the Business Corporations Act.
The court found that most of the relief sought by Zepeda, despite being framed as oppression, was properly for the corporation, not Zepeda personally.
Consequently, the application was dismissed due to procedural impropriety and Zepeda's lack of capacity to pursue corporate claims in a personal action.
