2 total
The court ordered the father to pay $18,000 in costs following his unsuccessful, aggressive, and near bad-faith urgent motion regarding parenting time.
This is a costs decision following an urgent motion concerning parenting time.
The father sought to modify parenting arrangements and brought an ex parte motion with serious allegations against the mother.
The mother was successful in the underlying motion and sought costs of $20,000.
The father argued the amount was disproportionate and proposed $5,000, citing financial hardship from supervised access costs and child support obligations.
The court found the father's conduct was aggressive, litigious, and hovered close to bad faith.
The father failed to attempt settlement before commencing litigation and made unverified serious allegations.
The court ordered the father to pay costs of $18,000 inclusive of disbursements and HST, payable at $3,000 per month beginning September 1, 2025.
The court ordered supervised parenting time for a father facing criminal charges and admitted surreptitious recordings.
This decision addresses an urgent motion concerning parenting time for a 10-month-old child amidst serious allegations of family violence and mental health concerns.
The court carefully analyzed the evidence, including affidavits, text messages, audio recordings, and medical reports, applying the best interests test under the Children's Law Reform Act.
The court emphasized the importance of an expansive approach to evidence in family law, especially in cases involving family violence, and ruled on the admissibility of contested evidence.
Ultimately, the court ordered supervised parenting time for the Father, citing concerns about his conduct, mental health, and the safety of the child and Mother, and declined to grant a without prejudice order.
