The appellant appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial judge erred in finding reasonable and probable grounds for his arrest and that his rights under ss. 10(a) and (b) of the Charter were violated.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's conclusion that the circumstances, including the fact that the appellant matched the description of a male who pointed a handgun, constituted reasonable and probable grounds for arrest.
The Charter arguments were not pressed and were found to have no merit.
The appeal was dismissed.
