1 total
Action struck as abuse of process and collateral attack on prior judgments regarding failed real estate deal.
The self-represented plaintiffs commenced an action attempting to relitigate a failed 2016 real estate transaction that had already resulted in a substantial judgment against the primary plaintiff and multiple subsequent dismissed claims.
The defendants moved to strike the claim.
The court granted the motions and struck the claim without leave to amend, finding it prolix, confusing, lacking any reasonable cause of action for the secondary plaintiff, an abuse of process constituting a collateral attack on prior judgments, and statute-barred against the agent defendants.
