The moving party sought to enforce an unsigned settlement agreement arising from a dispute over the validity of competing wills.
The moving party argued that an agreement on the essential terms had been reached through correspondence between counsel.
The responding parties opposed the motion, arguing that counteroffers were still being made and no final agreement was reached.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that there was no meeting of the minds on all essential terms and that the responding parties never agreed to the terms in the draft minutes of settlement.