The parties, who were married for less than a year, disputed the ownership of a dog named Casper.
The responding party commenced an application for the return of the dog but subsequently removed the dog from the moving party's home without his consent.
The moving party brought a motion for the interim return of the dog.
The court condemned the responding party's use of 'self-help' while simultaneously seeking the court's assistance.
The court ordered the interim return of the dog to the moving party pending a final determination of ownership and directed the parties to schedule a settlement/trial management conference.