The father brought a motion to stay an order making his child a Crown ward with no access, pending his appeal.
The child had been apprehended multiple times and placed in foster care.
The court dismissed the motion to stay the Crown wardship, finding it was not in the child's best interests.
However, the court granted a stay of the no-access order, allowing the father supervised access pending the appeal, as he posed no risk and temporary access would not impair future placement opportunities.
