The moving parties brought motions to quash an appeal from an order that dissolved two earlier orders.
The responding parties argued that the order was a final determination on the issue of standing, making it appealable as of right to the Court of Appeal.
The majority of the Court of Appeal held that the order was interlocutory, as it did not finally dispose of the issue of standing, and granted the motions to quash the appeal.
Borins J.A. dissented, finding the order final as it disposed of the plaintiffs' claim for interlocutory injunctive relief.