The plaintiff subcontractor brought an action against the defendant contractor for breach of contract and under the Construction Lien Act for unpaid amounts relating to the supply and installation of structural steel.
The defendant counterclaimed for damages, alleging the plaintiff caused construction delays and failed to complete its work, requiring the defendant to intervene.
The court found that the plaintiff completed its contractual obligations within a reasonable time and that the defendant breached the contract by refusing to pay the balance owing.
The defendant's counterclaim for set-off was largely dismissed for lack of reliable evidence, and the plaintiff was awarded the balance of the contract price.