2 total
Applicant awarded reduced costs of $45,500 due to excessive and disproportionate legal fees claimed.
The applicant sought full indemnity costs of $160,862 following motions for interim child and spousal support.
The court found that while success on the motions was divided, the respondent and co-respondents had behaved unreasonably, justifying a costs award in favour of the applicant.
However, the court found the applicant's claimed costs to be excessive, disproportionate, and manifestly unreasonable, noting the unnecessary duplication of effort by two counsel.
The court reduced the costs award significantly, ordering the respondent to pay $40,500 and the co-respondents to pay $5,000.
Court imputes $209,355 income to intentionally under-employed respondent who funded lavish lifestyle with unreported cash.
The applicant brought a motion for interim child and spousal support.
The respondent claimed he was laid off and had no income, despite a history of funding a lavish lifestyle through unreported cash from his family's tax-preparation business.
The court found the respondent intentionally under-employed, imputed his income at $209,355, and ordered interim child support of $2,789 per month and spousal support of $2,769 per month.
Claims for retroactive support were deferred to trial.
