The self-represented applicant sought judicial review of two Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) decisions that dismissed his discrimination application as an abuse of process and denied reconsideration.
The applicant also brought multiple procedural motions before the Divisional Court, including requests for adjournments, stays, and judicial recusals, alleging systemic bias and procedural unfairness.
The Divisional Court dismissed all motions, finding no denial of procedural fairness or reasonable apprehension of bias.
On the merits of the judicial review, the Court held that the HRTO's decisions were reasonable, noting the applicant's repeated failures to comply with tribunal directions and excessive filings.
