The appellant appealed a lower court decision that struck her claim, which alleged defamation, constructive discrimination, and harassment, without leave to amend.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's decision, finding no error in the conclusion that the claim failed to provide adequate notice, clearly identify causes of action, or set out material facts.
The Court also deferred to the motion judge's refusal to grant leave to amend and the costs award.
The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.
