The plaintiff sought costs of a motion for directions regarding the binding nature of an agreed summary of facts from a criminal proceeding.
The defendants sought their costs of the motion, and one defendant sought costs thrown away due to the adjournment of the trial.
The court reserved the costs of the motion to the trial judge, finding that the trial judge would be best placed to assess costs in the context of the final disposition.
The court dismissed the request for costs thrown away, as the adjournment was not the fault of any particular party.
