The applicant union sought to set aside a representation vote, alleging that the intervener union breached the Board's silent period by campaigning in the days immediately preceding the vote.
The Board dismissed the application, finding that the applicant's representative had waived any objection to the regularity of the balloting by signing a Consent and Waiver form prior to the counting of the ballots.
Furthermore, the Board concluded that the isolated technical breach of the silent period did not unfairly influence the outcome of the vote.
A certificate was issued to the intervener.