Summary judgment dismissing claim for intentional interference with economic relations set aside as genuine issue for trial exists.
The appellant appealed an order granting summary judgment that dismissed his claim against Linamar for intentional interference with economic relations.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the record contained evidence of actions and documents involving Linamar such that it could not be said there was no genuine issue for trial.
The summary judgment was set aside, and costs of the appeal were fixed at $10,000.
James Hacking v. Skyjack Inc. and Linamar Corporation, 2003 ONCA 17760
