4 total
Motion for leave to appeal Ontario Land Tribunal decisions granted with costs fixed at $5,000.
The moving party brought a motion for leave to appeal the decisions and orders of the Ontario Land Tribunal.
The Divisional Court granted the motion for leave to appeal and fixed costs at $5,000, to be awarded at the discretion of the panel hearing the appeal.
Tribunal approves settlement for Site and Area Specific Policy guiding Centrepoint Mall's mixed-use redevelopment.
The applicants appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on an Official Plan Amendment application to establish a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) for the redevelopment of the Centrepoint Mall site.
The parties reached a settlement agreement on a Revised SASP that will guide the future mixed-use redevelopment of the site, including new public streets, a central park, and high-density residential and commercial uses near a planned subway station.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the Revised SASP consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Official Plan, and allowed the appeal in part to approve the policy.
Tribunal grants party status to multiple stakeholders and schedules second CMC for Official Plan Amendment appeal.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding an appeal by the applicants from the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on an Official Plan Amendment application for the Centrepoint Mall property.
The Tribunal granted party status to several neighbouring landowners and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, and participant status to a local resident.
A second Case Management Conference was scheduled for January 22, 2024, to address procedural matters and a potential consolidation with a related appeal.
Tribunal accepts withdrawal of official plan appeal and issues procedural order for remaining fee appeal.
At a Case Management Conference, the Appellants withdrew their appeal under section 22(7) of the Planning Act regarding the City's refusal to amend the Urban Hamilton Official Plan, as a Ministry decision rendered it moot.
The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal.
For the remaining appeal under section 69(3) protesting the levying of fees, the Tribunal scheduled a two-day video hearing and approved the Procedural Order and Issues List submitted by the parties.
