The appellants appealed the dismissal of a negligence action arising from a single-vehicle accident in which the driver was seriously injured after leaving a municipal roadway.
They argued the trial judge erred in describing the accident location, in finding the roadway warning signage adequate, and in concluding causation had not been proven.
The Court of Appeal held the location was well understood by the trial judge, the warning sign sufficiently communicated the sequence of curves and advisory speed, and the causation finding was entitled to appellate deference.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
