6 total
Tribunal grants participant status, consolidates appeals, and schedules 14-day hearing for mixed-use development.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the respondent municipality for failing to make decisions on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.
The applications seek to facilitate a 28-storey mixed-use building.
The Tribunal granted participant status to four individuals, consolidated the appeals, and scheduled a 14-day hearing on the merits for October 2026.
Applicant awarded $3,559.50 in arbitration expenses following successful appeal on income replacement benefits.
The applicant sought expenses following a successful arbitration and subsequent appeal regarding her entitlement to income replacement benefits and the applicable interest rate.
The arbitrator awarded the applicant her requested expenses of $3,559.50, noting her complete success on appeal and the insurer's late reinstatement of benefits which caused the applicant to incur legal expenses.
Applicant entitled to ongoing IRBs; interest on overdue payments limited to 1% under New Schedule.
The applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident on October 29, 2010, and claimed statutory accident benefits.
The insurer reinstated her Income Replacement Benefits shortly before the arbitration hearing but disputed the need for an ongoing order and the applicable interest rate on overdue payments.
The arbitrator ordered ongoing IRBs at $400 per week.
On the issue of interest, the arbitrator held that because the accident occurred after September 1, 2010, the New Schedule applied, limiting the interest rate on overdue payments to 1 percent per month, despite the applicant holding a transitional policy.
Arbitration dismissed and counsel removed from record after applicant failed to attend hearing or provide instructions.
The applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and applied for statutory accident benefits.
Following a dispute, the applicant applied for arbitration but subsequently lost contact with her counsel and failed to attend the pre-hearing or the hearing.
At the hearing, the applicant's counsel brought an unopposed motion to be removed from the record due to a breakdown in the solicitor-client relationship, which was granted.
As the applicant failed to participate or tender any evidence in support of her claims, the arbitrator dismissed the arbitration and ordered the applicant to pay $1,000 in expenses to the insurer.
Arbitration dismissed and counsel removed from record after applicant failed to participate in proceedings.
After disputes arose, she applied for arbitration but subsequently lost contact with her counsel and failed to attend a pre-hearing discussion.
On the date of the hearing, her counsel brought an unopposed motion to be removed from the record due to a breakdown in the solicitor-client relationship.
The arbitrator granted the motion, removed counsel from the record, and dismissed the arbitration due to the applicant's failure to participate or tender evidence.
The applicant was ordered to pay the insurer's expenses in the amount of $1,000.
Court imposed case management and discovery deadlines in multi‑action civil litigation.
In multi‑action personal injury litigation involving several defendants, the court issued procedural directions to manage the proceedings efficiently.
The court ordered that the matter be case managed by the same judge and scheduled examinations for discovery of the plaintiff and the Family Law Act claimant.
Plaintiff’s counsel was directed to update productions, circulate request letters for outstanding records, and provide documents received to all defendants.
The court further directed that any motions for production under Rule 30.10 be brought by a specified deadline if responses remained outstanding.
The matter was removed from the assignment court list pending further order.
