The appellant appealed a trial judge's costs order in a family law proceeding regarding custody.
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge erred in upholding a previous judge's costs order that had been implicitly set aside, and in awarding an amount substantially in excess of party and party costs.
However, the Court noted that the respondent had made a reasonable settlement proposal regarding custody which the appellant rejected, justifying some costs to the respondent.
The Court granted leave to appeal costs, varied the trial judge's costs order to $4,000, and otherwise dismissed the appeal.