Following a settlement of an expropriation claim, the claimant brought a motion for the adjudication of costs under section 32 of the Expropriations Act.
The City argued that the claimant's legal fees were unreasonable and excessive, particularly criticizing the use of multiple counsel.
The Tribunal rejected the City's unsubstantiated allegations of abuse of public funds but found some of the time expended by the claimant's counsel to be excessive.
The Tribunal ordered the City to pay the claimant's costs, subject to a 15% and 10% reduction on specific legal fee invoices.