In bankruptcy proceedings arising from non-payment under a promissory note tied to the sale of a New York condominium, the court interpreted the note's limited recourse clause as capping recovery at one-third of sale proceeds rather than restricting recourse solely to identifiable sale proceeds in specie.
On that interpretation, the creditor remained an unsecured creditor after the debtor received the sale proceeds and therefore had standing to pursue a bankruptcy order.
The creditor's motion for a Rule 39.03 examination was dismissed because no further factual inquiry was necessary to answer the debtor's legal motion.
The debtor's motion to dismiss or strike the bankruptcy application was also dismissed, and the application was adjourned by agreement pending further materials and cross-examinations.