The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied certain treatment plans, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant contended that she suffered from accident-related psychological impairments and chronic pain, warranting removal from the MIG.
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she suffered from a psychological impairment or chronic pain with functional impairment that would remove her from the MIG.
As the disputed treatment plans were submitted on the basis that the injuries were outside the MIG, they were not payable.
The application was dismissed.