On a family law motion to change a final order, the applicant sought joint custody, an expanded parenting schedule, and corresponding child support changes.
Applying the best interests of the child test under s. 24 of the Children’s Law Reform Act, the court found the parties were unable to co-parent and ordered that the respondent retain sole custody and final decision-making authority.
The court declined to alter the existing schedule immediately, but prospectively ordered a week on/week off shared parenting arrangement beginning in May 2015 in light of expected changes to the respondent’s employment circumstances.
Child support remained unchanged until May 1, 2015, after which offset guideline support would apply, and section 7 expenses were to be shared proportionately to income.