The appellant police officer appealed a conviction for insubordination after he refused a lawful order to provide his residential address to the Force.
He argued the charge should be quashed due to a three-month delay in scheduling the appeal, that the Force failed to comply with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, and that he had a lawful excuse because his wife had previously been harassed by another officer.
The Ontario Civilian Police Commission dismissed the appeal, finding the delay was not undue, the Force had complied with the privacy legislation, and the harassment claim was not raised at the time of the order and did not constitute a lawful excuse.
The conviction and penalty of forfeiture of two days' leave were upheld.