2 total
Successful respondent on appeal awarded $6,000 in partial indemnity costs due to novelty of issues.
Following the dismissal of the appellants' appeal regarding insurance coverage for stolen marijuana plants, the respondent insurer sought costs.
The court awarded the respondent partial indemnity costs, noting that while the respondent was entirely successful, the legal issues were novel and there was no guiding precedent.
Costs were fixed at $6,000 inclusive of HST and disbursements, reflecting a modest allowance for junior counsel.
Appeal dismissed; stolen medical marijuana plants are not personal property usual to a dwelling under insurance policy.
The appellants appealed the dismissal of their action against their homeowners' insurance provider for the theft of medical marijuana plants from their backyard.
The insurer had paid out a limited amount under the 'landscaping' extension but denied full coverage under the 'personal property' provision.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that while the stolen plants became personal property upon being detached from the ground, they were not 'usual to the ownership or maintenance of a dwelling' as required by the policy.