The City of London passed an interim control by-law freezing land development along a specific corridor after discussing the matter in two closed meetings.
A property owner applied to quash the by-law, arguing the closed meetings violated the open meeting requirement under section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Planning Act provisions allowing interim control by-laws to be passed without prior notice or hearing do not create an exception to the open meeting requirement.
The Court upheld the decision to quash the by-law for illegality, emphasizing the importance of transparency and democratic legitimacy in municipal decision-making.