The applicant, a father, filed an application under s. 120 of the CYFSA alleging the respondent children's aid society failed to provide sufficient reasons for several decisions, including not investigating an incident where his son harmed the mother, investigating him but not the mother for another incident, and recommending a communication book despite a no-contact order.
The Child and Family Services Review Board found the applicant was not provided sufficient reasons regarding the unbalanced investigation and the communication book recommendation.
The application was upheld in part, and the respondent was ordered to provide detailed written reasons within 30 days.