The appellant pleaded guilty to theft over $5,000 after taking $317,000 from his elderly godmother.
He was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment followed by two years of probation.
He appealed the sentence, arguing the sentencing judge erred in finding a conditional sentence was inappropriate given his restitution, remorse, and loss of professional license.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the sentencing judge's conclusion that the objectives of deterrence and denunciation could not be met by a conditional sentence.