3 total
Offender sentenced to 5 years for bank robbery using an imitation firearm and wearing a disguise.
The offender was convicted of robbery with an offensive weapon, use of an imitation firearm, and wearing a disguise with intent following a bank robbery.
The court considered the significant and long-lasting psychological impact on the bank tellers, who suffered from PTSD.
The court weighed the aggravating factors of violence, planning, and greed against the mitigating factors of the offender's youth, lack of prior record, genuine remorse, and harsh pre-trial custody conditions.
A global sentence of 5 years imprisonment was imposed, reduced by pre-trial custody credit to approximately 4.5 years.
Offender sentenced to one year imprisonment for firing an airsoft gun at police officers.
The accused pleaded guilty to six offences arising from an incident in which he entered a police station with an airsoft gun and fired multiple times at officers and a civilian staff member, striking one officer in the leg.
The accused was motivated by suicidal ideation and intended to provoke police into shooting him.
The court imposed a sentence of one year imprisonment (9 months and 6 days after credit for pre-sentence custody and bail conditions), followed by two years' probation, a DNA order, and a five-year weapons prohibition.
The court balanced significant aggravating factors (planning, danger to public, victim impact) against substantial mitigating factors (mental illness causal link, remorse, rehabilitation progress, no criminal record, and collateral consequences).
The offender was sentenced to 12 months in custody and a 4-year driving prohibition for careless driving causing death and bodily harm.
This decision concerns the sentencing of Madison Sprayson following a fatal collision on Highway 407 in Pickering, Ontario, resulting in one death and serious injuries to others.
Sprayson was convicted of careless driving causing death and bodily harm under section 130(3) of the Highway Traffic Act.
The Crown sought a custodial sentence of 18 months, a 5-year driving prohibition, 24 months probation, and community service, emphasizing denunciation, deterrence, and public protection due to Sprayson's repeated driving infractions and denial of responsibility.
The Defence argued for a non-custodial sentence, highlighting Sprayson's personal circumstances, business responsibilities, and lack of criminal record.
The court imposed a 12-month custodial sentence, a 4-year driving prohibition, and 24 months probation with statutory conditions, rejecting community service due to lack of consent.
The decision carefully balances principles of parity, specific and general deterrence, and proportionality, while acknowledging the profound impact on victims and the offender's potential for rehabilitation.
