The appellant appealed the dismissal of her motion to change spousal support.
The parties had been married for 21 years and reached a consent order in 2012 providing for $12,000 per month in spousal support plus 27% of incentive employment income.
The motion judge dismissed the motion to change, finding that while the respondent's income had increased, no additional compensatory support was warranted.
The appellant argued the motion judge misunderstood the principles of compensatory support under Moge v. Moge.
The Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal, finding no legal error, error in principle, or significant misapprehension of evidence.
