The accused, awaiting sentencing for sexual offences against a minor, was charged with breaching his release conditions by being in the company of children under 16.
The Crown sought his detention on all three grounds.
The court found detention was not necessary on the primary or secondary grounds, as the proposed surety plan adequately attenuated the risk.
However, the court ordered detention on the tertiary ground, finding that a reasonable member of the public would lose confidence in the administration of justice if the accused were released, given the seriousness of the underlying convictions, the proximity of his sentencing, and the direct connection between the alleged breach and the original offences.