The parties separated shortly after the birth of their child.
The mother sought sole custody, while the father sought joint custody with a parallel-parenting plan and equal access.
The court found that both parents were loving and capable, but had communication difficulties and a lack of trust.
The court ordered joint custody with a parallel decision-making structure to minimize conflict while ensuring both parents remained meaningfully involved.
Access for the father was increased but not to an equal time-sharing arrangement due to the lengthy commute between the parents' homes.
The court also imputed $11,000 in annual income to the father for his side business as a DJ and ordered retroactive child support, while reducing his ongoing support by $200 per month due to high access costs.