1 total
The court granted a vesting order, finding a father made a valid inter vivos gift of property to his son despite no formal documentation.
The court considered whether Brian Buday was gifted a property by his late father, Paul Buday, despite the absence of formal transfer documentation.
The court reviewed the evidence of improvements made by Brian Buday, the intentions of Paul Buday, and the positions of other interested parties, including Glen Buday and government respondents with tax claims.
Applying the law of inter vivos gifts and the presumption of resulting trust, the court found that the property was indeed gifted to Brian Buday in 1989 and ordered that it be vested in his name.
