The applicant husband sought to set aside six separation agreements made between 1999 and 2007, claiming he was coerced and controlled by the respondent wife.
He also sought spousal support and an equalization payment.
The court applied the Miglin framework and found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of vulnerability or that the agreements were inconsistent with the Divorce Act.
The court concluded the agreements fell within the range of normative outcomes and dismissed the application.
