The accused was charged with impaired operation causing death, operating with a blood alcohol concentration exceeding 80 mg, and operating a motor vehicle while disqualified following a fatal snowmobile collision.
The principal issue at trial was whether the accused or the deceased passenger was driving the snowmobile immediately prior to the collision.
After a lengthy trial involving competing collision reconstruction experts, the court found the physical evidence, injury patterns, and scene analysis supported the Crown’s theory that the accused was driving and that the passenger had been ejected prior to the snowmobile striking a tree.
The court concluded the accused’s blood alcohol concentration was between 120 and 168 mg/100 mL and that his impaired operation was at least a contributing cause of the death.
The defence theories regarding collision mechanics, evidentiary deficiencies, and alleged investigative failures did not raise a reasonable doubt.