The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision which found that his accident-related injuries were predominantly minor.
The applicant argued that the Tribunal failed to consider medical evidence and was biased in relying on surveillance evidence, amounting to a violation of procedural fairness and a significant error of law or fact.
The Tribunal denied the request, finding that it had considered the medical evidence but found the surveillance evidence more persuasive, and that there was no error of law or fact that would have resulted in a different decision.
