6 total
Written hearing scheduled to consider settlement of appeals regarding cannabis cultivation zoning.
At a Case Management Conference regarding appeals of an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law regulating cannabis cultivation, the Tribunal was advised that a full settlement had been reached.
One party withdrew their status on consent.
The Tribunal scheduled a written hearing to consider the settlement agreement and directed the parties to file supporting materials, including expert evidence.
Tribunal issues Procedural Order and schedules 10-day hearing for expropriation compensation claim.
The Tribunal convened a Case Management Conference regarding a claim for compensation following an expropriation of lands by the Town of Oakville.
The parties agreed on a draft Procedural Order and requested a 10-day hearing.
The Tribunal scheduled the hearing for December 2025 and issued the Procedural Order to govern the proceedings.
Tribunal schedules further Case Management Conference to allow parties to finalize settlement of zoning appeal.
The appellants appealed the municipality's denial of a zoning by-law amendment application to remove a holding symbol from their property.
At a status hearing, the parties advised the Tribunal that they were close to a settlement and requested additional time.
The Tribunal scheduled a further Case Management Conference to allow the parties to finalize the settlement details.
Participant status granted to adjacent property owner in appeal of holding symbol removal.
During a status update hearing, the Tribunal granted participant status to an adjacent property owner who raised concerns about a shared laneway.
The parties advised they were close to resolving the matter, and the Tribunal scheduled a further status update.
Tribunal scheduled a status update hearing to allow parties to continue settlement discussions regarding zoning appeal.
At the first Case Management Conference, the parties advised that they were engaged in settlement discussions.
The Tribunal scheduled a status update hearing to allow the parties time to continue negotiations.
Minor variance to reduce agricultural setback for new dwelling authorized on consent.
The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment's denial of a minor variance to reduce the Minimum Distance Separation I setback from an abutting livestock operation to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling.
The parties reached a settlement prior to the hearing.
Based on uncontested land use planning evidence, the Tribunal found the variance met the four tests under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act and would not negatively impact future agricultural operations.
The appeal was allowed and the variance authorized subject to conditions.
