2 total
The court clarified that alternative access arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic must consider all options, including potential face-to-face visits.
The Respondent Mother brought an urgent motion seeking clarification on access arrangements after the Durham Children's Aid Society suspended all face-to-face access due to COVID-19.
The court clarified its previous endorsement, stating that parties should consider all options for meaningful contact, including in-person visits, while prioritizing child safety and adhering to the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017.
The endorsement reiterated principles from Ribeiro v. Wright regarding parenting arrangements during the pandemic.
The court found a parent's motion regarding the suspension of supervised access during the pandemic to be urgent.
The Respondent Mother brought an urgent motion in response to the Durham Children’s Aid Society's decision to suspend all face-to-face access at its Supervised Access Centre due to the COVID-19 crisis.
The court found the matter urgent, emphasizing the need to balance child protection with maintaining parental relationships during the pandemic, and ordered a teleconference to establish an appropriate access regimen.
