The appellant appealed an order dismissing her motion to set aside a 1993 consent judgment and a 1997 order on the basis of alleged fraud and non-disclosure by the respondent.
The motion judge had dismissed the motion as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, and issued an order under s. 140 of the Courts of Justice Act prohibiting the appellant from commencing further proceedings without leave.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's findings, agreeing that the fresh evidence of fraud lacked probative value and that the issues of financial disclosure were barred by res judicata.
The appeal was dismissed.
